The blog for the cult Manhattan cable-access TV show that offers viewers the best in "everything from high art to low trash... and back again!" Find links to rare footage, original reviews, and reflections on pop culture and arthouse cinema.
YouTube sure has changed. Its capricious enforcement of
copyright claims continues apace, but its anti-nudity/anti-sex stance has
morphed into a “don't ask, don't tell” mode, in which adult materials stay up
until someone, anyone, complains about them.
Thus, the surprising discovery of Radley Metzger's
The Image (aka The Punishment of Anne,” 1975) in its entirety, unedited and uncensored, on YT. Don't
get me wrong — I'm not complaining about this. I think adult clips should be on
YT, behind a firewall, as is the case with this film. The picture is a stylish
slice of “Euro chic” from Metzger that he signed with his own name. The only
other film with hardcore scenes he released under his real name was
Score (1974), which circulated in various versions, some of
which were decidedly “soft.”
The Image was made at an interesting time
in Metzger's career. Softcore had lost its audience — late-night “Skinemax” was
a decade away, and the VCR was a luxury item at best. Hardcore was the only way
to go in terms of sex pictures, and so Metzger assumed the “Henry Paris”
pseudonym. Starting with The Private Afternoons of Pamela
Mann (1974), he made a quintet of hardcore features. All of them were
visually well-crafted and several light years above the average porn “product.”
Although it starts out like Metzger's softcore features,
The Image takes a full turn just before its midpoint and
becomes a hardcore s&m movie that lacks only “money shots,” as Metzger's
female characters were allowed to enjoy their orgasms and the lead male here
comes inside them, rather than doing the usual “full display” ritual.
The film boasts picturesque location footage of Paris and
has one aspect familiar from Euro-produced sexploitation — a bizarrely chosen
older male voice for the lead (think Norman Rose or John Bartholomew Tucker on
a not-so-wholesome day), meaning the narration sounds like a slightly skewed
movie trailer.
The picture has an interesting pedigree: It was adapted from
a kinky 1956 novel by “Jean de Berg,” an alias of Catherine Robbe-Grillet, the
wife of novelist (and fellow bondage lover) Alain R-G. The plot is a variation
on The Story of O, with a dominatrix character added into
the proceedings. The protagonist (Carl Parker) is “offered” his slave (Mary
Mendum) by the domme (Marilyn Roberts), who starts out as a stereotype but
winds up becoming the true female lead in the story.
Catherine Robbe-Grillet
Given that Catherine R-G
(still with us, as of this writing) is a rather buttoned-down type (see her
supporting roles in her husband's films), it makes perfect sense that the more
intense but less conventionally attractive domme figure ultimately becomes the
most intriguing member of the lead trio.
Although the domme figure is the best-sketched female
character, the submissive is the best rendered, thanks to an intense
performance by Mendum. She is the single best “discovery” in the later work of
Joe Sarno. She starred in five of Joe's films under the name “Rebecca
Brooke,” most notably Abigail Leslie Is Back in Town (1975).
Coming across as a kinkier cousin to Lara Parker
(“Angelique” from the original Dark Shadows), Mendum was
terrific in the Sarno films, mostly because she always appeared on the verge of
both an orgasm and a nervous breakdown. She delivered Joe's often over-ripe
dialogue perfectly and was, along with Jamie Gillis, one of the few performers
who really “got” what Sarno was doing (angst-ridden melodramas with a kinky
undercurrent).
In The Image she is equally “on the edge”
throughout. She perfectly conveys her character's desire for pain and her
transformation when forced to sublimate her desires in a public setting. Online
sources say that she was dating Metzger at the time the film was made, which
indicates that theirs was, shall we say, an “understanding” connection.
Given the fact that Sarno kept making softcore for as long
as he could (and he never used his real name on the hardcore he subsequently
made), it's surprising to see Mendum engage in two graphic oral sex scenes,
letting go in two urination humiliations, and being whipped and tormented in
Metzger's picture.
As noted above, Metzger was no stranger to directing
hardcore by '75, since he was already in his Henry Paris period. It is jarring,
though, to see The Image make the turn from soft- to
hardcore midway through — the beautiful Parisian location footage, for
instance, is suddenly used only for establishing shots rather than providing
picturesque locations for the action.
What is not surprising is how (that word again!)
classy the film is, compared to other hardcore, and how the
film has a distinctly male point of view but
also explores the conflicted sensations and emotions of its women
characters.
Catch it while if you can on YT, but most certainly also
check out the Metzger-authorized Synapse release of the film on disc!
Last year, the deaths of Ted V. Mikels and Herschell Gordon
Lewis meant that the last great “showmen” of genre/exploitation pics were gone.
Radley Metzger's death two weeks ago at the age of 88 meant that the last
link to the classier side of adult filmmaking is now gone. Metzger formed a
sort of “unholy trinity” with the other two auteurs of softcore, Russ Meyer, and
Joe Sarno. Metzger was the one who worked with the highest budgets (Russ's pair
of Fox productions aside), and he was accorded the most respect of the trio.
This respect came from the fact that he crafted “Euro chic”
softcore, which looked beautiful and felt like the films that ruled the
arthouse at the time (the Sixties and early Seventies). While the other two
titans of tease were clearly influenced by foreign art films – Sarno's work was
inspired by and looked like much of the Swedish cinema of the period, while
Meyer's films were the truest expression of Eisenstein's editing principles
ever committed to celluloid – Metzger clearly mimicked the style of the
European masters in his work, to the extent that his films looked as if they
were made by a European (and, thanks to the sometimes stilted dialogue, often sounded as if they
had been written by a person who was indeed writing subtitled, translated English).
I wrote a tribute to Metzger for a magazine that is now
defunct. You can find the full text on the Funhouse website, here. In
reproducing a good deal of the text here, I wanted to supplement it with clips.
I notice that YouTube's whimsical and sporadically (but adamantly) enforced
rules against the display of the undraped human body have kind of gone by the
wayside in the last decade. A lot of scenes from Metzger's softcore are up, as
are entire features.
His “Henry Paris” (aka Harry Paris) hardcore films are
present on YT in the guise of trailers, still photos, and dramatic scenes –
yes, they were dramatic scenes in Metzger's porn, and that made it like nothing
else that was being made then, or today.
Herewith, tribute to Metzger, written in the 2000s:
Like the other two softcore gods of the ’60s, Russ Meyer and
Joe Sarno, Metzger cut his filmmaking teeth in the Army, serving in the Motion
Picture unit during the Korean War. Unlike Meyer and Sarno, Metzger got his
first commercial experience in the film biz as an editor removing censored
scenes from (what else?) “risque” foreign films – ironic, given that the films
he made and distributed later on were the subject of various legal battles with
state censors. Shortly after leaving the service, Metzger made a no-budget
independent feature called Dark Odyssey (1957) with William
Kyriakis. This family-loyalty drama is notable only for its eye-catching NYC
locations and its Greek-American milieu. In 1960, Metzger started the distribution
company Audobon Films with a colleague and began a profitable career acquiring
and “reworking” foreign movies.
Metzger made his first adult feature in 1965. The
Dirty Girls started a seven-year run of imaginatively made softcore
movies, all of which are being brought out on DVD from First Run. Dirty set the
tone for them all, with its La Dolce Vita-inspired Euro decadence, and two
elements that became Metzger staples: location shooting in picturesque European
cities and an amplified amount of implied sex. “They saw the nudity even if I
didn’t put it in,” he later joked to an interviewer.
Metzger’s longer erotic interludes, in which a character
would frequently “service” another by slipping out of camera range (leaving an
orgasmic young woman’s face onscreen to imply what was really going on), owed a
debt to one of the more notorious French imports of the era, Louis Malle’s
The Lovers (the ultimate “dirty foreign movie” made in
1958). In that film, the male lead disappeared out of camera range for a few
seconds, making actress Jeanne Moreau quite happy – and enraging every state
censorship board in the Bible belt.
Metzger’s next b&w tease, The Alley
Cats (1966), boasts some terminally cool surf music and some of the
aforementioned overripe dialogue. When asked if she’s afraid of making love,
one young lady declares, “I plan to go moist to heaven…”
The transition to color in Carmen, Baby
(1967) encouraged Metzger to make his tales of bored jet setters and their
ladies of easy virtue even more bold and audacious. Two favorite moments: a
girl entertains at a party by performing a suggestive dance with a phallic wine
bottle to a pitch-perfect Herb Alpert-style instrumental, and the host of the
same bash-cum-orgy encourages his female guests to get into the groove by
offering “pills, ladies… pills!”
From ’67 to ’77, Metzger made four softcore classics and a
small handful of hardcore features that rank among the best ever made.
Therese and Isabelle (1968), his tale of a lesbian affair
between French schoolgirls (supposed to be teens, but look severely
twentysomething). The movie is still copied today – witness the Piper Perabo
cumming-of-age cable staple Lost and Delirious (2002). [Can
you tell this was written for an adult publication? --Ed.]
It’s most notable for Metzger fans because it introduced his
wildest trademark: the “obscured frame,” in which either the “naughty” part of
what we’re watching is covered up – yes, Radley was one of the innovators who
first used the technique spoofed to no end in the Austin Powers movies – or we
view a sex act from a distance, usually through a distorted glass surface (most
often a mirror). Thus, when we finally “see” Therese and Isabelle consummate
their teen-girl love, they are seen: disappearing behind some furniture in a
church chapel, reflected on the surface of a vase (!), and exploring each
other’s bods in a stylishly composed long shot that reveals…not much of
anything.
Despite the obvious tease factor at work, the movie is still
sexy as hell, since Metzger concentrates his energies on the build-up to sex,
utilizing classical music and soft, graceful camerawork to complement a very
obvious but effective voiceover. Our heroine Therese tells us what we’re
missing visually, boasting in classically purple prose about the way Isabelle
enters her: “Three fingers entering me, three guests to take the pleasure to…”
Corny dialogue, to be sure, but in the period before
Deep Throat and the “couples porn” rage, Metzger’s movies
were the only high-profile American erotic films a couple could check out
without feeling unduly uncomfortable. In fact Metzger’s next picture, his most
psychedelic, Camille 2000 (1969), was crafted to make them
feel very comfortable indeed… particularly during a long, lush sex scene,
viewed (natch) in a rippled mirror. Metzger had great confidence in his
audience’s attention span, especially when it came to sexy interludes like
Camille’s prison-themed party in which tuxedoed gents lead super-mod babes
around on leashes and in handcuffs.
The Lickerish Quartet (1970) is Metzger’s
most “experimental” and arguably his best movie. Fantasy and reality collide as
a trio of jaded sophisticates (mother, son, stepfather) watch an old stag reel
for entertainment (oh, the idle rich) and then discover that the brunette star
of the loop is performing at a local carnival as a motorcycle stunt rider (!).
Upon bringing the girl back to their labyrinthine castle, they find that the
film has changed and their newly-blonde house guest is clearly going to have
her way with the lot of them.
As he moves this kinky variation on the arthouse classic
Last Year at Marienbad, Metzger delivers his most
extravagant sex scene ever: a bibliophile’s wet dream in which our blonde
temptress, clad only in go-go boots, and the master of the house (a rather
unsightly older man wearing nothing but black socks) screw in a home library,
rolling over and over on a floor embossed with the dictionary definitions of
words like “phallus,” “fornicate” and, naturellement, “fuck.”
The male lead’s paunchy nude bod is one of several bizarre
details (including quick cuts to that favorite bar toy, a bird dipping his head
in a drinking glass) that Metzger inserts into Lickerish –
they can be interpreted as tongue-in-cheek that the director himself is caught
up in the same delirium his characters are experiencing. The last line of
dialogue probably supplies the best answer: “Don’t take it so seriously, it’s
only a film!”
Metzger’s last theatrically released softcore film,
Score (1972), is the perfect product of the porno chic era,
a film that couldn’t possibly appear in multiplexes today – unless, perhaps, it
was made by Pedro Almodovar. Here a Dangerous Liaisons-like
couple bet each other they can seduce an innocent young couple they’ve invited
over for a dinner party. When the swinging takes place, the wives wind up
together… as do the husbands.
The fact that the evening’s events are fueled by pot and
amyl nitrate makes Score a gorgeous relic from a far freer
time; the film also was released in three separate cuts, each one containing a
bit more of the male gay coupling.
In 1975, Metzger turned a corner and embarked upon a short
career in hardcore under the pseudonym “Henry Paris.” The six triple-X features
he made from ’75 to ’78 are still given high marks by porn aficionados today
because their production values were uncommonly high, the explicit sex is
cleverly worked into a (gasp) storyline and the acting is well above par. The
best known of the Harry Paris productions, The Opening of Misty
Beethoven (1976), is a “Pygmalion” tale of a sophisticate who trains
a young woman in the finer points of social etiquette, and, er… cocksucking.
Misty was shot in Paris, Rome and NYC, and is surprisingly witty for a porn
film – all in all, a few light years beyond the crude and clunky Deep
Throat.
Imagine the idea of fans for porn soundtracks – they exist,
and they are especially fond of the music for Metzger's Henry Paris films.
So the last of the truly talented erotica/porn filmmakers of
the pre-home video era has left us. Erotica is now reduced to Fifty
Shades of Gray, and porn has gone back to its initial state of tiny
little sequences that showcase “the act” and perhaps (if time permits) have a
minute or two introduction with something approximating a “plot” (or, better
stated, a motivation for the sex).
Metzger flourished in the time when there were indeed movies
about sex being released to both arthouses and grindhouses. He lent a lot of
style and (that word again) class to his soft- and hardcore features. Before
the Sixties that wasn't called for, and sadly, that became the state of things
again (with a scant few major exceptions, like Andrew Blake and Rinse Dream) after the
Seventies. Thankfully Metzger's films remain available and do show those who
make sex videos today many things about how erotic (and even, on occasion,
sophisticated) sex cinema can be.
This one sequence is a distillation of what Metzger’s work
was all about. It’s corny yet sexy, playful yet adult,
old-fashioned yet Sixties “modern.”
A master of subversion, Seijun Suzuki took the relatively
low budgets he was given to make B-features by the Nikkatsu studio and created
scores of the most memorably surreal, Freudian, and explosive films ever. Like
many cult icons, Suzuki was underappreciated while he was working regularly,
but he thankfully lived to see his work hailed around the world as
groundbreaking and completely unique. (Although, being an infinitely frank
soul, he did declare it “too late.”)
Many of his obits felt that contextualizing him was in
order, so the magic name “Tarantino” was invoked. Tarantino’s work is closer to that of the more procedural, less dazzling, and far more violent Japanese genre filmmaker Kenji Fukasaku than
Suzuki. The obits also cited Wong Kar-Wai and Jim Jarmusch. The latter is a
diehard fan and paid tribute to Suzuki’s work rather brilliantly in
Ghost Dog. The former might love Suzuki’s work, but John Woo
is closer to the mark — particularly in The Killer, where he
seemed to be fusing Suzuki’s Branded to Kill (1967) with
Sirk’s Magnificent Obsession, which is quite a combination
of influences.
It was also interesting to note that the official
announcement of his death was made by a Nikkatsu representative, given that he
had an acrimonious split with the studio, whose head at the time said his films
“made no sense” and weren’t making any money. Whether or not they did well at
the box office, it’s been noted that young Japanese college students loved them
and were in fact the first cultists for his work.
The most-circulated interview with Suzuki is this one, conducted
in 1997:
Suzuki's frenzied stylization of his
storylines made him “a Japanese Sam Fuller” (although, of course, Fuller was as
much a screenwriter as he was a director). By the time that he was able to do
what he wanted with these assignments — mostly because the Nikkatsu chiefs
initially ignored their B-feature production, so the directors could do
what they wanted — he was using every method possible to make his films jump
off the screen into the lap (and mind) of the viewer.
A recent festival held at the Walter Reade theater in
Lincoln Center included a few of his earlier genre pics that have been unseeable
in the U.S. (some of them signed by “Seitaro Suzuki,” his real name). The
revelations were that they were *heavily* plotted for B-features, and that,
even though Suzuki and his crew were breaking the fourth wall by drawing
attention to the film’s style, he did stick rather closely to the formulaic
plots he was given. If one sees his pictures in chronological order, it’s
obvious that he was desperate to break free of the constraints of
B-moviemaking.
Here is the trailer for one of the earlier efforts,
Everything Goes Wrong (1960):
Thus, he began to “explode” his heavily-plotted genre pics
with framing, editing, eye-jarring sets, and surreal touches like an overlay of
animation. In interviews, he stressed that he was intent on making
“entertainment,” not art, and that he wanted to please the audience. His array
of techniques, though, suggested that he was well-aware of the European
masterworks made in the Fifties and Sixties, as well as the modernist work of
contemporaries like Oshima and, without question, the pop art that overwhelmed
the era.
Kabuki has been cited as another influence, and while it no doubt was,
one gets the sense watching his work that Suzuki was an incredibly “cinematic”
artist, rather than one toying with theatrical techniques.
And he had some of the best titles in the business. The
second half of this title is one of my all-time favorites for a crime film — or
a film in any genre. Herewith the opening of Detective Bureau 23: Go
to Hell, Bastards! (1963):
One of the names who is rarely linked to Suzuki is another
kindred spirit, namely Robert Aldrich. In Kiss Me Deadly,
Aldrich approximated the unapologetic violence of Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer
novels. Being a master-manipulator — and an artist who loved to play with and
rework the genres he took on, much like his near-namesake Robert Altman — he
left the graphically violent moments in the narrative *between* the shots. “Beat”
Takeshi Kitano did this beautifully in his Hana-bi (aka
Fireworks) (1997), and Beat has also cited Suzuki as a cinematic hero. This is
another dominant characteristic of Suzuki's work: going “over the edge” in
terms of subject matter and behavior, and yet not showing anything truly
objectionable onscreen.
His trippiest yakuza drama was undoubtedly Tokyo
Drifter (seen here in its entirety with no English subs), which was
one of the two films that became cult items in the West during the Nineties.
I would also liken him to Nicholas Ray, in that both men
were masters of widescreen and “color-coding” their characters. Akira Kurosawa
was most certainly one of the greatest widescreen filmmakers ever, but Suzuki
is closer to Nicholas Ray in terms of the feverish pace of his films and the
fact that he unabashedly used color to tell his story, as he did in the
unusually-kinky-for-its-time, brothel-set drama Gate of
Flesh (1964) (seen below in its entirety, but with no English subs).
One of the other things that is truly mind-roasting and
extremely important about Suzuki's work is the way in which, as he progressed
through the Sixties, he began to toss off sequences that other directors
would've made longer set-pieces out of. This is most blatant in Branded
to Kill, where he quickly disposes of two impressive “trick-shot”
murders (one of which is duplicated in Jarmusch's Ghost Dog,
thus the thanks to SS at the film's end) and a brilliantly insane twist — our
hero getting away from a tightly secure building by leaping out the window and
riding a hot-air balloon to safety.
Other filmmakers would've spent 10-15
minutes easily on each of these moments, while Suzuki disposes of them in less
time than it takes to listen to a Ramones song.
The most famous aspect of Branded is that
it got Suzuki fired from Nikkatsu. He sued the studio and then became the
subject of a blacklist that found him unable to work as a director for a
decade. The ironic element here is that he had taken on the film as a favor to
the studio. It was begun by another director, but then became one of the “most
Suzuki” of all of Suzuki's genre pics. When he was unable to work as a director
he took on work as an actor on TV and in the movies. Here is an ad he appeared
in for a toilet cleaner of some kind:
When he finally returned to filmmaking, he wound up making
seven more films, the last two of which were released internationally, as they
were made after his worldwide cult-reputation had grown. I will confess that,
while I enjoy his “Tasho trilogy” of very “high art” films, I prefer him
subverting a weird script, as he does in his “comeback” film, A Tale
of Sorrow and Sadness (1977).
The film, to which I devoted an entire episode of the
Funhouse, is a bizarre tale of the “making” of a female athlete — at first
turned into a sexy golf pro by corporate execs, the lead is later stalked by a
scary neighbor who wants to steal her lifestyle. It's an amazing film that
definitely is an extension of the weirdness that he was crafting in the Sixties
(it is in fact that only film he made after his comeback that practices the
same kind of subversion).
Watching it I was put in mind of two films about the
manufacturing of a woman star by men. The first was Dennis Potter's
too-little-seen Blackeyes (1989) and the second was
The Legend of Lylah Clare (1968) by none other than Robert
Aldrich. Suzuki's film is definitely in the same vein, as we see the execs
figuring out how to have their golf pro dress, which ends up in her wearing a
bikini on the links at one point.
The first half of the film is decidedly about male
manipulation of women, but the second half is a more tangled statement about
celebrity and its horrors, embodied in the person of the fangirl neighbor who
wants to “be” our golf pro heroine (who has also become the host of a daytime
talk show). Sorrow and Sadness is a great Suzuki film that
has been shuffled under the carpet for the most part — it was released in the
U.S. on DVD but with scenes that were missing the proper subtitling. The film
is not available for free streaming online, but I found a music video created
with images from it:
Suzuki's “Tasho trilogy” was the first time that he was
making art films “on purpose.” The first film in the trio,
Zigeunerweisen (1980), is a beautiful-looking picture that
has some unforgettable imagery. Suzuki seems to have seen the films of Alain
Resnais (whose work is as influential as Godard's to some leading
Asian filmmakers) and works on a Marienbad-like level of
ambiguity with these films, set in an era when Japan had a fixation on Western
culture and dress. When Suzuki was unable to secure theatrical distribution for
the film he had it shown in an inflatable dome in Tokyo.
The second of the two “Tasho” films,
Kagero-Za (1981), also contains some gorgeous imagery but is, admittedly, rather slow-going.
The “Tasho” films are indeed beautiful-looking, but they
lack the humor and sheer perversity of Suzuki's earlier work. Before the third film in the trilogy was made, Suzuki directed the very strange and pretty much unfindableCapone Cries a Lot (1985), atoo-long-for-its-own-good but still imaginatively designeddrama. The humor and perversity returned for good in Pistol Opera (2001), his remake of
Branded to Kill with women in the lead roles.
His last film is certainly a wonderful genre-bending act of
subversion. The musical Princess Raccoon (2005) is an
intentionally kitschy musical that blends Western musical genres and a
fabricated Japanese fairy tale. It is not as involving on a narrative level as
his Sixties work, but it proved that, even at the age of 82, he could still
deliver downright weird and brilliantly imaginative sequences.
Suzuki’s legacy is assured — the man whose movies “made no
sense and no money” outlasted his detractors and former employers.
I'm pleased to say that this tribute to Alan Colmes will be
a Hannity-free piece. Alan spent 13 years being Sean Hannity's partner (some would
say “sidekick”), and I skillfully avoided ever seeing more than five minutes of
the show. This obit for Alan is solely concerned with his talk-radio work,
pre-Fox News (the cable TV network and the radio syndication outlet). Listening to Alan's radio shows, one was aware of his debt
to the East Coast pioneers of talk radio. He either verbally cited them as
influences or, as was the case of Jean Shepherd, he interviewed them on-air. I
first heard of Alan when he was doing a show on WPIX-FM, where he was known for
a short time, for some incomprehensible reason, as “Alan Le Colm” (spelling is
dubious, as was the whole nickname thing). When he arrived at WABC-AM for a
morning drive-time slot, they dubbed him “Alan B. Colmes” – the middle initial
fitting in with their call-letters but being another dippy work of fiction (his
middle name was Samuel). WABC did a short obit tribute this past week to Alan
in which they kept identifying him by this stupid moniker, which seemed moronic
and disrespectful.
His specialty during his stint at WPIX was having various levels
of kooks as guests, in an echo of Long John Nebel's radio show. This meant he
could be heard talking to folk who interacted with aliens, various and sundry
psychics, and the odd show-biz type. Like all great radio personalities, the thing that made Alan
special was his voice. He had a warm, comforting sound, and occupied an unusual
place in the talk-radio spectrum, since he was openly liberal and proudly
Jewish, as well as being okay with letting the “inmates run the asylum” by
having segments on his shows that encouraged creative prank-calling. The best
of these was “Radio Graffiti,” a segment where you were allowed “one sentence,
one sentence only.” (An even better, longer version from the WEVD years can be
found at the bottom of this webpage.)
As talk-radio became incredibly “specialized” on the AM band
(read: simply conservative chatter, or all sports drivel all the time), Alan
had fewer outlets to be heard on. This resulted in him being on a trio of
stations that all shifted their format, meaning that he was on the last hours
of all three (he was the very last voice heard on two of them; I can't verify
this about the third).
The first was 66 WNBC-AM, where Alan took over for Joey Reynolds when he was “moved on” by management. Alan had Joey on as a guest
during that time and it's pretty fascinating, since Joey was in transition and
the callers are openly abusive to both Colmes and Reynolds (who keeps reminding
them he doesn’t work at NBC anymore).
Alan polished his talk-show formula beautifully on NBC in
the afternoon drive-time slot from 1987 to October '88 (the point at which I
became a devoted listener). Alan hosted the very last show on the station
before it made the switchover to “the FAN” (an all-sports format that gets
amazing ratings and is toxic for folks like me).
From there Alan went to WMCA, the one-time home of the man
who created talk radio as we know it, Barry Gray. Alan was on that station from
'88-'89, when it, too, changed formats to all-Christian radio (more deadly than
sports!). This is the best example of Alan's radio work on YT – an evening in
which he pretended that he was giving up hosting his show and gave it over to
the callers. What resulted was beautiful chaos, in which prank callers
alternated with what sound to be prepared pranksters recruited by Alan ahead of
time. Truly fun stuff.
In the late 1990s – around the time he began his TV stint
with Hannity – he had a late night stint at WEVD. This station was a longtime
left-wing station (named after Eugene V. Debs) that found Alan in good company
politically. He also still devoted time to comedy – including two memorably
serious interviews with Jean Shepherd and George Carlin. WEVD went off the air in 2001, with Alan again being the
very last voice heard on the station – wags on a certain radio-pro/fan message
board deemed Alan “the Grim Reaper of Radio.” Alan got a lot of shit from a lot
of parties for a few things he did, most notably his “partnership” with Sean
Hannity. Now that he's left us, I'd like simply say that he was a great radio
personality who gave me a lot of entertainment in the years that I listened to
him. And my personal favorite partnership he had? It was with a caller, who was
actually a professional performer that called in as different characters. Alan had three regular callers, all of whom were played by
this unnamed, unidentified comedian (there is *nothing* on the Internet to
identify this guy). The last creation was “Mace,” a gravel-voiced alcoholic who
called up Alan while he was fully lit and ready for destruction. The calmest of
the three was “Steve,” a wimpy guy who had a bizarre obsession with Eddie
Albert and was dying to host Alan's show. The best comedy character, though, was “Elmo.” Alan's
nemesis, Elmo called him to remind him that he wasn't funny, he conducted bad
interviews, and generally made a lousy host. Alan would allow Elmo to dissect
him at length – I remember him noting that Colmes “sucked all the humor out of
comedians,” in reference to the Shepherd and Carlin interviews. It was a nice
touch for a radio show – an antagonist who called in to say how badly the show
was going. Elmo also took the time to mock Alan's liberal politics. And
when he did it, it was funny….
It is the mid-1950s. A disheveled middle-aged man comes out
in a swallow tail coat. He is here to deliver a lecture, but realizes he doesn’t
have the text of his speech. He searches for it, taps his pockets, looks in his
coat, glances around to see if he dropped it… and then says, “HOWEVER….”
November 2004. A very old gent, 90 years of age, comes out
onstage in a swallow tail coat, looking like he woke up in the damned thing.
He’s beyond disheveled, but he’s here to tell us something. He suddenly
realizes he doesn’t have his speech. He taps his pockets, looks in his coat,
glances around to see if he’s dropped the text, and… “HOWEVER….”
The one thing that struck me the most about Professor Irwin
Corey’s act is that he “aged” into it. He was always funny, but a middle-aged
man being a crazy lecturer isn’t anywhere near as funny as a 90-year-old man
doing the same act, and coming out with the same improvised nonsense. When the
middle-aged Corey did it, it was radically weird — the end of the act I’m
describing above (at least on the Steve Allen Show on which
I have him doing it) is that the Professor would run into the audience and the
show’s crew members would pursue him with a butterfly net.
As a very old man doing the bit, though, he was the “voice of
wisdom” — except his wisdom made no sense, and was thus a perfect spoof of
academia and the notion of a “public intellectual” (a real, actual phenomenon
we used to have in this country, smart people who would hold forth on news and
talk shows about smart things!). As the Internet has crushed all our attention
spans and made us prone to loving small bits of digestible but pointless
information, Professor Irwin Corey became a comedian whose crazy, rambling
lectures truly suited our culture.
His early life was rather amazing and was discussed in his
obits: born as one of six children, he wound up in an orphanage (his parents
couldn't afford to feed him and his siblings). From the age of 13 onward he was
on his own, traveling the country, then toiling for a public work relief
program (where he became a featherweight champion boxer) and the Int'l Ladies
Garment Workers Union. His work in the union's show Pins and
Needles in the late Thirties spurred him on to the career in show biz
that he pursued for the next 80 years. It also cemented his eternally Progressive
political stance.
Irwin was not the only family member to pass the century
mark. In researching this piece, I found an article on the York Daily
Record site (a newspaper in York County, Penn.) about his sister
Thelma. She was a professional dancer who, in 2009, celebrated her 100th
birthday. The article can be found here.
A lot of tributes online have linked to YouTube clips, but I
wanted to explore an earlier adventure in the Professor's career. In December
1944 (the year after he appeared in the New Faces of 1943
show), he appeared on a few episodes of The Chase and Sanborn
Hour, hosted by Edgar Bergen and his little wooden pal Charlie
McCarthy.
Edgar needs a tutor to teach Charlie (it wasn't clear what),
and the gent recruited is the Professor, who was already being called “The
World's Foremost Authority.” It's fascinating to hear Corey at this point
because he's formulating the character, who has a somewhat British accent. (And
his voice is quite high – but, then again, Corey is only 30 years old!)
Two of the episodes with Corey as Charlie's tutor, in which
the Professor does what seems to be his own material, are available online. In
the first, Corey compares L.A. to NYC — when asked if it's hard to get around
NYC, he responds, “Any taxi driver will tell you where to go… and they usually
do!” In the second episode he gets his own segment, lecturing on the future and
electricity (and, again, it sounds like his own material and ad-libs).
The December 3, 1944 show can be found here. It is the 45th
show in the collection. Corey enters at the 13:00 mark and is on for four and a
half minutes.
The December 10, 1944 showcan be found here – click the
Chase and Sanborn Hour, and listen to the
“Charlie McCarthy 44-12-10 Signe Hasso.mp3” link. The professor appears
around 10:15.
I never spoke to Irwin one-on-one or interviewed him, but I saw him perform
in a few unique circumstances. The Nov. 2004 gig I mentioned above took place
at Lehman College in the Bronx, when a show called “The Comedians” played in
their auditorium. This particular show was traveling around the U.S. at the
time, and its roster was quite impressive: The Professor, Bill Dana (subbing
for Louis Nye, who wasn't well), Mort Sahl, Shelley Berman, and Dick Gregory.
The host was the “baby” of the bunch in terms of age, Dick Cavett.
The Professor kicked ass at 90, but even more impressive was
what occurred at an April 2014 screening of the documentary Irwin and
Fran at the Anthology Film Archives.
Corey was a mere kid of 99 (!) at the time. He had agreed to
do a Q&A after the picture, but he wound doing what amounted to more than
20 minutes of standup comedy from his wheelchair. Members of the audience kept
asking him serious questions, but I was very happy to throw him a “straight
line” after he asked us, “Any more stupid questions?”
Feeling that he did not want to answer any more queries
about the film — which is a very touching portrait of the relationship between
Corey and his wife Fran, who were married for 70 years until her death — I
asked about his sex life. He responded with a line that he attributed to George
Burns, likening senior-citizen sex to “trying to shoot pool with a rope.”
The audience was amazed at the energy coming from the
Professor. He was pretty much unable to hear anything by that point (his son
was repeating the questions to him, in a louder tone of voice so he could hear them) and he was
indeed wheelchair-bound, but he was “on” and in the mood to do his shtick. And
he was *very* funny.
By comparison, at his 100th birthday celebration, held at
the Actor's Temple, he spoke but only for a few minutes and with none of the
gusto that he had at the Anthology event. I'm assuming he was exhausted by the
proceedings, in which he was being surrounded by people and praised by numerous
folks at the mic.
I feel the only way to end this piece is to showcase Irwin's
best performance in a film. He had done serious acting since he was a young man
and had many credits in “legit” theater, but his movie roles were mostly
supporting parts that were pretty silly (as with his “mystery man” character in
Car Wash). That was not the case with Herb Gardner's
Thieves (1977), directed by John Berry.
Irwin had played the role of Joe Kaminsky, the cabbie, in
the Broadway production of the show, and repeated his performance in the film.
It's a beautiful turn, mostly because he's playing a cartoonish character who
is simply a note of “local color” for a lot of the film, until we reach a
beautifully written scene in which he talks to his daughter, played by Marlo
Thomas.
I remember that Frank Rich — the lousy, *horrible* movie
reviewer (he hated every great movie of the mid-Seventies) who then became a
very influential theater critic and is now a political pundit (?) — trashed
Thieves and, in particular, loathed Corey's performance. As
he always was, Rich was wrong about the film, and the Professor — I find this
scene beautifully scripted and just wonderfully acted by Thomas and Corey. (Note: I uploaded the clips seen below, including the eight-minute scene in question. The sound is only active on one channel, and the titles come from the episode I did on Thieves back in 2014.)
Since the Professor's act consisted of nothing but
surprises, given his talent for ad-libbing, I think the biggest surprise was
that he was a very talented character actor as well….
*****
Thanks much to Max Schmid — host of a very long-running show about old-time radio on WBAI (check out his FB page here) — and Stephen K. for
help in uncovering the Chase and Sanborn shows.