The blog for the cult Manhattan cable-access TV show that offers viewers the best in "everything from high art to low trash... and back again!" Find links to rare footage, original reviews, and reflections on pop culture and arthouse cinema.
I've had a few Easter traditions on the
Funhouse TV show, for my “Easter blasphemy” episodes. One of the
most bizarre (recommended many years ago by friend Bob Fingerman) is
“The Donut Repair Club,” an ongoing series of cwazy Kwistian
kiddie videos.
Funhouse viewers are well familiar with
the concept behind these vids, but for those who are unaware: Rob
Evans, “the Donut Man,” tells children that “life without
Jesus/is like a donut/'cause there's a hole in the middle of your
heart.” Thus, you must fill your donut... er, heart and put Jesus
right in there. The “repair club” thus literally “fix” donuts
by putting munchkins into the center of the holed pastries;
metaphorically they fill kids' hearts by sticking Jesus in there.
A lot of Donut Man clips are now on YT,
but years ago I uploaded an “introductory” bit from the very first
Donut Repair Club video:
Evans' tapes came out on a regular
basis in the Nineties, and a daily TV show was spawned out of the
concept. I have wondered every so often when I revisit his tapes on
the show: whatever happened to the Donut Dude? Thankfully, the
Internet holds the answers to most trivia questions, and thus I am
happy to learn that Rob Evans is still convincing children to fill
their holes [insert highly inappropriate joke *here*], while he also
has a day job as a home builder (presumably a contractor).
This article gives Evans' back story and explores his attitude towards his music. It's fascinating
to know that his journey toward finding Christ began when he was
experiencing the “drugs and rock and roll scene of the '60s and
'70s.” This is reflected by some of his songs – he has one that
duplicates “Maxwell's Silver Hammer,” and another song seems
incredibly reminiscent (read: the melody is identical) to Buzzy
Linhart's “Friends.”
The interviewer declares Evans' Donut
Man to be “an almost Christ-like figure” in comparison to other
children's Xtian entertainers. For his part, Rob lets us know that
the musicians he played with on his Donut Man recording sessions were
noted session men in the mainstream music industry. A bassist who
played with him has also worked with Barbra Streisand, Stevie Wonder, and Madonna.
The producer for his Donut Man albums later produced a Star
Trek soundtrack and the score for Pixar's Up.
One of his drummers also worked with Phil Collins.
The Donut Man's biggest step was his
conversion to Catholicism. He notes that he did it because he
believes that communion “isn't symbolic,” it's really happening.
(The cannibalistic, blood-drinking portion of Catholicism always
fascinated me when I was back in Catholic school, realizing that
there are those who want to “drink the blood” of their deity....)
Evans and his interviewer discuss
whether Catholicism is Christian... or even Catholic. (That part
puzzled me a little. As much as I escaped the church, fleeing for my
sanity, I would readily admit that the Catholic church is indeed very
Catholic – with an uppercase “C.”) Says Donut Man: “To the
degree that the Catholic Church is idolatrous, it’s not Christian
so it’s really not Catholic.”
On that interesting theological point
the interview fades away, with Evans noting he does 80 to 100 gigs a
year. I found his Facebook page, and yes indeed, the Donut Man does
still tour his act and involve local children in loading up them
holes. He also is a granddad (he and his wife have been married since
he was 20 years old and he's now well over 60).
Perhaps the oddest note on his Facebook
“Like” page is that one comment (posted a few weeks back, on
March 9) comes from a white-power person (who claims to be a Japanese
soldier who fought in WWII) who argues that Evans' act is “a plot
by the Jews.” It's an interesting addition to the page, which
otherwise is all about brotherhood, love of Christ, and Evans'
performances and love of family. Perhaps the people running his page
don't realize there is a “delete” command on FB?
In any case, the Donut Man is still
with us, still preaching to the youngsters about filling their holes
with Jesus. What more can one ask for from a gent who openly admits
his character's “costume” was inspired by “Mr. Greenjeans” on
Captain Kangaroo?
A few extra clips... The one black girl
in the group does a rap number about Christ.
A country-fried tune about the prodigal
son.
One of Evans' songs that will NEVER
exit your cranium, a ditty urging the listener to “skip and sing
and dance and shout Hallelujah, shout Hallelujah!”
The Donut Dude in drag, doing his
“Maxwell's Silver Hammer” riff:
And one more bit of exposition,
explaining the donut-repair metaphor. Fill those holes, chillun!
My father and I, a million years ago,
in Carl Schurz Park.
I’ve spent a lot of my life thus far writing and talking
about my favorite movies and other pop-culture phenomena. My first great
influence (besides my mother, who got me interested in modern art and movie
musicals — and yes, I am a straight man who loves musicals) was my father, who
died last Monday. In one of our last conversations in the hospital I was able
to thank him for introducing me to great b&w and foreign movies as a kid,
so I can think of no better way to celebrate his life than to assemble a little
list of the things he got me hooked on, which became some of the cornerstones
of the Funhouse TV series.
Sure, there were things my dad loved that I never got
interested in: the American Civil War, WWII (both the military strategy and
them crazy Nazis), British mystery series. There are also things I am deeply
obsessed with that he didn’t have the slightest interest in, naturally — and
things like team sports that we disliked in tandem. But the sheer amount of things
he exposed me to as a young child, things that just blew my tiny mind, are
worth mentioning because… well, I miss him already (he had not been well for
several weeks before his death) and I couldn’t thank him for everything, so this blog entry will
serve as a sort of an addendum, a cosmic thank-you note.
Firstly, the comics. My dad was a devotee from the Thirties
through the Fifties, and was one of those many seniors who had a story about
how his mother threw all his comics away (in his case while he was in the Navy
— my grandmother considered them “dust-gatherers”). He later took me to the
Phil Seuling NYC comic cons (where we got autographs — free autographs! — from
Kirby and Steranko) and would often do the old-comic-fan thing of noting that
“I had that comic!” when he saw something hanging up on display for sale for
several hundred (or thousand) bucks.
Of course, I don’t think he kept his stash “bagged and
boarded,” so they probably would’ve disintegrated over the years; one of my
most vivid collector-memories is us receiving a package of Fifties-era Will
Eisner comics that literally did disintegrate on us as we opened and attempted
to read them.
So, first on the list is the work of Jack Kirby. My father
worshiped Kirby — he had taken drawing classes at the Phoenix School of Design
and appreciated the Old Masters (and modern abstract artists), but he was never
ashamed of reading comics. He raised me to respect the fertile imagination and
endlessly vibrant work of “the King” of comics. As many parents do, he decided
to buy and read me comics as a way of getting back into them himself. Among the
first I have memories of are the reprints of Kirby’s Sixties output — the seminal Marvel stuff. Dr. Strange, a
Steve Ditko masterwork, became my own personal favorite, but I shared my Dad’s
enthusiasm for all of the Kirby creations.
I was really young when the D.C. “Fourth World” titles from
Kirby were released (and failed, and are, as with all great pop artifacts, now
looked upon as touchstones for so much that came after). Kirby’s psychedelic
explosions, his use of photos in his comics, his amazing futurism (mixed with a
heavy regard for ancient mythology and modern urban living) was mind-blowing
and — what’s best for a kid — the colors were sensational (to this day I can’t even
look at b&w reprints of Kirby or Ditko’s color work).
My dad’s steeping me in these wildly imaginative comic books ruined me for the current generation of Marvel (and D.C.) movies. There is so
much vivid color in those comics that is not duplicated in the current
blockbuster feature films (for both the conventional characters and even in
something like The Watchmen — a reverent adaptation, but
where was the brightness of the colors from the comic?) that we wound up
disappointed whenever the films came out. The last film I saw with him in a
theater was the first Avengers feature, which we enjoyed
(mostly for the Loki character) but both thought was less than meets the eye,
and nowhere near the wildly imaginative work of Jack Kirby.
Still on the topic of comics, my father did have a love for
noir comics, which brought him to the work of Steranko in the Sixties. He got me
interested in that surprisingly small handful of Steranko’s
SHIELD comics and, through the comic book history books he
bought for us to read (mainly Jules Feiffer’s The Great Comic Book
Heroes — the original version with the full reprints in it — and
Steranko’s own, unfinished History of Comics), he introduced
me to the noir world of the master, Will Eisner.
He enjoyed buying all kinds of heroic comics as a kid, but I
think he spoke the most about the experience of getting the Eisner comic
inserts in the Parkchester Press that contained the Spirit,
Lady Luck, and other Eisner creations. As a kid, I thought the Spirit was
surprisingly non-heroic and kinda silly (I still marvel at how many times
Eisner depicted him getting his ass kicked by villains), but I grew to love the character.
The first pages were stunning — the splash-pages where Eisner basically drew
on the cinematic language of both the German Expressionist silents and the
then-flourishing crime films that were later (in the Fifties) labelled “noir”
by the French critics.
Years later I was able to return the favor and turn my dad
on to Frank Miller (whose debt to Steranko and Eisner was constantly in the
forefront, and much-acknowledged) and the comic book genius of Alan Moore. (I
also got him to read the Vertigo titles by Neil Gaiman and Garth Ennis.) Of
course, his talk about how much he loved Laura,
Gilda, and The Big Heat led to my own
teenage and 20-something deep obsession with all things noir. Even when he and I
were out of my touch, I kept moving in the directions he had led me (and, as I
often do with fascinations I’m introduced to by others, I dive in headfirst and
want to see everything associated with the artists).
Robert Ryan in The Set-Up.
As for Hollywood stars, he had had a teenage fascination
with the stars of the above-mentioned films — he had crushes on Rita Hayworth
and Gene Tierney, and wanted to be like Dana Andrews and Glenn Ford. (No John
Wayne for him.) His noir leanings were evident when he also went off on
speeches about the under-appreciation of Edmond O’Brien and Robert Ryan. He
also introduced me to the icon of icons in the Sixties and early Seventies,
Bogie. Rita was sexier, though:
Speaking of that period of nostalgia (which is best
illustrated in Harry Hurwitz’s The Projectionist, which I
got the privilege of showing my dad — he loved everything associated with that
film, but had never gone to see it in a theater for some reason), he also
fostered my interest in Karloff, Lugosi, Price, and the Hammer Horrors. One of
the touchstones of my childhood was Famous Monsters of
Filmland (and its short-lived competitor The Monster
Times). This was a regular purchase that was acquired where comic
books were sold.
At times my father realized this stuff was potentially
terrifying (I never admitted it, but I had insane nightmares after seeing an
R-rated double bill with him of Tales from the Crypt and The
House That Dripped Blood), so he would remove pages or — this
horrifies me as a diehard collector — “X” out with magic marker any offending
pics of really odd, scary-ass creatures. (Thankfully, this was done on an infrequent basis.)
That period of nostalgia had other icons, and my dad was
also instrumental in me winding up becoming a Marxist, “of the Groucho sort”
(as a French radical once put it). b&w comedies still aired regularly on
television when I was young, and thus I became utterly fixated on the Marx
Brothers’ Paramount films and the first two MGM titles. My father also
introduced me to Laurel and Hardy , whom I love (the Three Stooges I found on
my own, on daytime TV), but the Marxes were especially amazing to me as a
child.
Harpo is often spoken of as an id in human form, but Groucho
and Chico were as well. Their humor was not only smart, literate, bizarre, and
rambunctious, it was also fast (the best cartoon equivalent being Looney
Tunes). Groucho became a personal hero to me as a kid, but I was mesmerized by
the uninhibited humor of all three Marxes throughout my early years.
I have a dark sense of humor that was more than likely
inspired by seeing Dr. Strangelove as a kid. My father had
taste for grim, black comedy (now called “dark” to be p.c.). He was also
fascinated by comedians who did different voices (a product of his growing up
in the radio era) so Peter Sellers was one of his big faves in the Sixties and
early Seventies (yes, he also introduced me to the wonders of the Milligan,
chief Goon and bottle washer).
Enjoying Strangelove naturally led to my
fixation on all the black humorists of the Sixties as a kid in late grammar
school (my friends and I were “precocious” when it came to reading matter):
Kurt Vonnegut led to Joseph Heller, which led to Bruce Jay Friedman and Terry
Southern.
The love of British humor (which I have taken in one
direction with Stewart Lee, and my dad took in another with Rowan Atkinson)
continued with my dad sharing Python and Fawlty Towers with
me. As regards British TV, though, I have to focus on the first two series he
introduced me to that were completely mind-warping, The
Avengers and Patrick McGoohan's blissfully brilliant The
Prisoner.
Although it's an incredibly “Sixties” show (especially its
final episode), The Prisoner still stands as a TV landmark.
A spy saga that indicted “the System” in general; a rebellious hero who faced a
nameless, dangerous bureaucracy; a series that defied the rules of series TV by
not explaining its key mysteries. It remains a prime example of what television
can do when the creators don't talk down to their audience and don't feel the
need to extend their creation beyond a handful of episodes (McGoohan was forced
to extend it to 17 episodes; he initially planned only seven).
Another cornerstone of my fascinations has always been radio
— the medium that is now is dominated by awfully cramped playlists and
conservative talk (and that one topic no one in my family has cared about, team
sports). My dad was a product of the “radio days,” having grown up in the
Thirties and Forties. His personal faves were The Shadow and
I Love a Mystery, but he also had a passion for
Inner Sanctum and comedy shows (Benny, Burns & Allen,
etc). He even liked soap operas as a kid (he had fond memories of staying home
sick and hearing things like Portia Faces Life), but could
never stand Lum and Abner or Vic and Sade (now considered
the greatest comedy of old-time radio; my father begged to differ).
The Shadow is pretty much the old-time
radio show that draws newcomers in, since the one super-power that Lamont
Cranston possessed — “the ability to cloud men's minds” so he became
“invisible” to them — was ideal for an audio medium. The show remained on the
air for a long time and still has a very strong following among those who love
old-time radio.
Now we come to the movies. I suffer from cinemaddiction —
not for mainstream product, but for the old, the foreign, the independent, and
the work of the great auteurs and the showcases for the great screen
performers. At a very young age (somewhere in the early grammar school period)
I first saw Citizen Kane, because my dad sat me down and
watched it with me, thereby sparking my interest in, and passion for, great
cinema.
He followed this a short time later by telling me I *had* to
see this French movie, Cocteau's Beauty and the Beast. That
one was (like The Prisoner) a mind-fuck for my young noggin.
He sat with me watching it when it aired on Channel 13 (our local PBS channel)
one evening. It was (and will always be) mesmerizing. The chandeliers held by
arms, the characters gliding along, the gorgeously composed fantasy elements,
as well as Jean Marais' awesome lion make-up (everyone knows the Beast is a
much more charming and interesting character than Marais' prince).
The films he would tell me about that he had seen on his own
(I was way too young to go to these rated-R movies) were political thrillers by
this guy named Costa-Gavras. When I interviewed C-G some years back, in
conjunction with the opening of his film Amen, I did
something I haven’t done on any other interview, thankfully — I had a false
first take and had to start over as I re-phrased my first question.
The reason?
I was flashing back to hearing about his films from my dad, and also the fact
that my father had interested me in the script of State of
Siege (which came out as a pop paperback — ah, the Seventies). I had
no idea what it was about (although Yves Montand looked very cool in shades),
but understood it all later on. The music from Z was a
particular favorite of my father’s. We, in fact, had the album by guitarist
John Williams, in which he performed a bravura performance of the piece:
Returning to comedy, I have to note that another film I
heard about long before I saw it was The Producers. I now
have the whole thing memorized, but still enjoy watching it every so often. My
dad loved Jewish comedy, and Nazi humor — thus, the fixation on Sellers, who
declared The Producers his favorite movie on more than one
occasion, including his liner notes for the LP, which I bought to help remember
the lines, not knowing it also included the cheesy go-go music (“Ulla, go to
work!”).
My father and I could talk for endless amounts of time about
character actors and comedy supporting characters. His preference for comedy
was decidedly Jewish (although he grew up a Catholic and left the faith early
on, as I did). Thus, he found this scene from Little Murders
endlessly funny (as of course it is). The movie both made me laugh and really
did creep me out as a kid: I thought that I, or
someone I loved, would get shot through a window. And of course the film’s
message about urban violence and the American sense of delusion (and love of
firearms) never, ever ages….
He also turned me on to a bunch of humorists who have sadly
been mostly forgotten, or identified with only one thing they wrote. In the
latter category is the great Max Shulman (whom I wrote about at some lengthhere; he is of course best known as the creator of Dobie
Gillis). Shulman’s work was wonderful to read as a kid — since a good
deal of his output was written from the point of view of an innocent, who even
a kid would realize is insanely naïve. Some of the basic elements of his work
were time-bound to the era in which he was writing (the late Forties and
Fifties), but the comic situations he crafted were timeless.
On a more somber note, one of the people my dad was a major
fan of was John Cassavetes. He would tell me much about the TV series
Johnny Staccato, which he had loved (and which offered
John’s first directorial efforts after Shadows). He also
raved about Husbands. I finally saw the film as a teen (I
delved deeply into middle-age crisis movies as a teen, which was rather odd by
the time I became a middle-aged person — although I did know what to
rewatch….).
As the Seventies wore on, he wasn’t seeing many movies in
theaters, except for the items that he and I saw together (Planet of the Apes
pictures, James Bond outings, Bruce Lee vehicles, etc). One of the films he *loved* on TV that I
thought seemed fun but didn’t seem to have a plot or any coherence at all was
Mean Streets. My father recognized the characters from the
Sicilian part of his family (he grew up in the Bronx and was often brought to
Arthur Avenue, the “Little Italy” of upper NYC); to me the film just seemed a
jumble of good scenes and funny performances with no plot.
When I began seeing films in repertory theaters, I realized
that the Mean Streets I had seen was — much like my other
teenage faves, Midnight Cowboy and Taxi
Driver — absolutely destroyed for television. “Strong language,”
violence, and any kind of sexual content were removed, and so the film seemed
to be about nothing at all. The film I saw in theaters was indeed a masterwork,
one that Scorsese created variations on for years to come (Goodfellas,
Casino, etc).
I end up back where I started, with nostalgia for the
Thirties. When my father lost his mobility and needed a walker to get around,
he stopped seeing movies in theaters. I kept trying to convince him that they
make accommodations for handicapped folks (I know that’s not the politically
correct term, but my dad was not a young gent by this point). He still refused,
and so we watched movies on his VCR that I had on SP speed (he didn’t want me
to wire up a DVD player, more stubborness), ones we both could enjoy that I
hadn’t seen in a while.
The films we ended up watching were almost all W.C. Fields
vehicles. My dad loved Fields above all others (well, Mel Brooks, Groucho, and
Carlin were high up there as well). He had had me watch his films whenever they
appeared on TV when I was but a wee nipper (the kind Bill Fields would’ve
kicked in the ass). I thus have always had a major soft spot for the ultimate
comic curmudgeon.
My dad in fact appeared several years ago on an episode of the Funhouse TV
series to talk with me about his love of Fields, and the Thirties moviegoing
experience in general. I shot it to air in June, the month of his and my
birthdays, and (naturally enough, given Fields’ emphasis on dysfunctional
family humor) Fathers Day. In that show my dad defended Bill F. against charges
that he loathed children (it supposedly was an act, but then again I’m sure his
alcohol intake used to determine how he felt about people he encountered; one
of his salutations for his close friend Eddie Cantor was “Christ-killer”).
Fields does come from an era when un-p.c. humor was not just
tolerated it was encouraged, and yet (like Groucho) he seemed to exalt the con
man who could take down the rich, arrogant bastards in society. As a put-upon
husband and dad he had no equal, and he definitely spawned Ralph Kramden,
Archie Bunker, and Al Bundy (and, methinks, the “Battling Bickersons” on
radio); John Cleese has gone on the record saying that Fields was one of the
key inspirations for Basil Fawlty.
My dad shared all of these items with me, and I had the
pleasure later in life to share many things with him. We spoke on the phone on
an average of once a day, sometimes more depending on whether one of us had a
trivial item to impart about some individual whose work we loved or hated in
common (this included a lot of celebrity deaths, but also some celebrity
birthdays).
He was sick and in pain for three months before his death
last week. The calls that we normally shared were replaced with calls from the
hospital, updating me on his condition, and lifeless calls to and from him in
which he didn’t want to talk at all. I had one final amazing in-person conversation with
him three days before he died, where he was “opened up” for chat by a friendly
nurse, and we were able to talk about the past (his relatives, our attending
the Seuling comic cons) and the present (the usual silly trivia we shared). I
made him laugh when I told him about something Joey Reynolds had done on
YouTube, and we talked about the new Shatner book about Nimoy (my dad was a
massive “classic Trek” fan).
That was the last time we spoke like that. The next two days
he was in terrible shape, and on the following morning he was gone. I miss him
incredibly — most especially the long, sprawling phone calls.